Retraction
Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractility of Fatigued Canine Diaphragm
Paper Information
Record ID:
1396
Author(s):
Journal:
Publication Date:
June 01, 2001
Retraction Date:
April 01, 2013
(12.6 years years ago)
Subjects:
Country:
🇯🇵 JapanArticle Type:
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Open Access:
Yes
DOI:
PubMed ID:
Retraction PubMed ID:
Retraction Details
Citations (6)
6
Total Citations1
Post-Retraction(16.7%)
5
Pre-Retraction0
Same DayPost-Retraction Citation Analysis
0
Within 30 days
0
Within 1 year
1
After 2+ years
3348
Days since retraction (latest)
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jun 2022
3348 days after retraction
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Sep 2012
188 days before retraction
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Nov 2010
854 days before retraction
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jan 2009
1551 days before retraction
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Oct 2004
3104 days before retraction
Paper citing Midazolam Versus Propofol for Reducing Contractili...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jun 2003
3592 days before retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations:
6
Years Since Retraction:
12.6 years
Open Access:
Yes
Last Checked:
Never