Retraction
The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case Study of Grapevine Leafroll in the North Coast of California
Paper Information
Record ID:
19297
Author(s):
Journal:
Publication Date:
May 01, 2015
Retraction Date:
October 01, 2018
(7.1 years years ago)
Subjects:
Institutions:
- Montana State University Extension and Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Robert Mondavi Institute Center for Wine Economics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
- University of California Cooperative Extension and Foundation Plant Services, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Country:
🇺🇸 United StatesArticle Type:
Publisher:
American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Open Access:
Yes
PubMed ID:
Not indexed in PubMed
Retraction PubMed ID:
Not indexed in PubMed
Retraction Details
Citations (7)
7
Total Citations2
Post-Retraction(28.6%)
4
Pre-Retraction0
Same DayPost-Retraction Citation Analysis
0
Within 30 days
2
Within 1 year
0
After 2+ years
212
Days since retraction (latest)
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Unknown
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: May 2019
212 days after retraction
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Feb 2019
150 days after retraction
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jul 2017
457 days before retraction
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Apr 2017
548 days before retraction
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Dec 2016
669 days before retraction
Paper citing The Economic Benefits from Virus Screening: A Case...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Oct 2016
714 days before retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations:
7
Years Since Retraction:
7.1 years
Open Access:
Yes
Last Checked:
Never