Retraction
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of Risk for Cardiovascular Disease Development
Paper Information
Record ID:
20066
Publication Date:
July 02, 2018
Retraction Date:
September 01, 2018
(7.2 years years ago)
Subjects:
Country:
🇧🇷 BrazilArticle Type:
Publisher:
Brazilian Society of Cardiology
Open Access:
Yes
PubMed ID:
Not indexed in PubMed
Retraction PubMed ID:
Not indexed in PubMed
Retraction Details
Retraction Reasons:
Nature of Retraction:
Retraction
Retraction Notice:
10.5935/2359-4802.20180038Additional Notes:
Title in Spanish: Relação Neutrófilo-Linfócitos na Avaliação do Risco para Desenvolvimento de Doença Cardiovascular; Article retracted and replaced with English language version
Citations (8)
8
Total Citations8
Post-Retraction(100.0%)
0
Pre-Retraction0
Same DayPost-Retraction Citation Analysis
0
Within 30 days
0
Within 1 year
8
After 2+ years
2199
Days since retraction (latest)
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Sep 2024
2199 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jun 2024
2105 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Sep 2023
1853 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Oct 2022
1508 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jun 2022
1369 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Dec 2021
1216 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Sep 2021
1096 days after retraction
Paper citing Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Evaluation of R...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Nov 2020
817 days after retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations:
8
Years Since Retraction:
7.2 years
Open Access:
Yes
Last Checked:
Never