Retraction
A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision
Paper Information
Record ID:
3006
Author(s):
Journal:
Publication Date:
September 19, 2012
Retraction Date:
October 22, 2012
(13.1 years years ago)
Subjects:
Institutions:
Country:
🇨🇳 ChinaArticle Type:
Publisher:
Elsevier
Open Access:
Yes
PubMed ID:
Retraction PubMed ID:
Retraction Details
Citations (10)
10
Total Citations9
Post-Retraction(90.0%)
0
Pre-Retraction0
Same DayPost-Retraction Citation Analysis
0
Within 30 days
3
Within 1 year
6
After 2+ years
3082
Days since retraction (latest)
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Unknown
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Mar 2021
3082 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Aug 2017
1754 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: May 2016
1287 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Apr 2016
1257 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jan 2016
1187 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Jun 2015
952 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: May 2013
191 days after retraction
Paper citing Development and Validation of a New Outcome Score ...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: May 2013
191 days after retraction
Paper citing A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a...
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Apr 2013
161 days after retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations:
10
Years Since Retraction:
13.1 years
Open Access:
Yes
Last Checked:
Never