Retraction

Lidocaine gel vs lidocaine spray in reducing pain during insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device

Retraction Details

Nature of Retraction:

Retraction

Additional Notes:

see also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/2D6894B94A82DF6769B2376C79FA9C

Citations (13)

13
Total Citations
2
Post-Retraction
(15.4%)
11
Pre-Retraction
0
Same Day
Post-Retraction Citation Analysis
0 Within 30 days
1 Within 1 year
0 After 2+ years
638 Days since retraction (latest)
Lidocaine Administration Techniques for Head and Limb Wound Anesthesia: Injection vs. Topical Application
Samad Shams Vahdati, Alireza Ala, Mehran Attari et al. (7 authors)
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Published: Feb 2025
638 days after retraction
Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review
Mayisah Rahman, Connor A. King, Rosie Saikaly et al. (11 authors)
Cureus Open Access
Published: Mar 2024
3 citations
308 days after retraction
Response to letter to editor about data integrity assessment in obstetrics & gynecology by May M Linn & Ben W Mol
Haitham Torky
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
Published: Jul 2022
288 days before retraction
Effectiveness of lidocaine spray on radial arterial puncture pain: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial
İsmail Yıldız, Çağdaş Yıldırım, Ayhan Özhasenekler et al. (5 authors)
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published: Oct 2021
10 citations
581 days before retraction
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Self-administrated vaginal 2% lidocaine in-situ gel for pain relief during copper intrauterine device insertion in women with previous caesarean delivery only: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Ahmed M. Abbas, Noura H. Abd Ellah, Maryt A. Hosny et al. (5 authors)
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care
Published: Feb 2021
1 citation
820 days before retraction
10% lidocaine spray for pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Nalinee Panichyawat, Theethat Mongkornthong, Thanyarat Wongwananuruk et al. (4 authors)
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
Published: Jun 2020
10 citations
1043 days before retraction
Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety and Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review
Laura Nguyen, Larkin Lamarche, Robin Lennox et al. (7 authors)
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada Open Access
Published: Dec 2019
23 citations
1227 days before retraction
Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review
Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Jeffrey T. Jensen, Ilza Monteiro et al. (7 authors)
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica Open Access
Published: May 2019
34 citations
1445 days before retraction
Different forms of lidocaine administration during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Erdem Kısa, Osman Raif Karabacak
The Anatolian Journal of General Medical Research Open Access
Published: Jan 2019
1585 days before retraction
Use of a novel suction cervical retractor for intrauterine device insertion: a pilot feasibility trial
David K. Turok, Rebecca G. Simmons, Benjamin Cappiello et al. (6 authors)
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Open Access
Published: Nov 2018
5 citations
1642 days before retraction
Authors’ reply to letter to the editor: Lidocaine gel vs lidocaine spray in reducing pain during insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device
Haitham Torky
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care
Published: Jan 2018
1949 days before retraction
Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement
Blair Dina, Leah J. Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao et al. (4 authors)
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Open Access
Published: Nov 2017
34 citations
2003 days before retraction
Comments on manuscript: Lidocaine gel vs lidocaine spray in reducing pain during insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device
Ahmed M. Abbas
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care
Published: Sep 2017
1 citation
2070 days before retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations: 13
Years Since Retraction: 2.5 years
Open Access: Yes
Last Checked: Jul 24, 2025
Related Papers
The value of endocervical and endometrial lidocaine flushin…
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics • 14 citations
Sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol for completion of first t…
European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care • 12 citations
Oral micronised flavonoids versus tranexamic acid for treat…
European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care • 9 citations
Sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of a T380A intrau…
European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care • 32 citations
Can Porphyromonas gingivalis be a novel aetiology for recur…
European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care • 12 citations