Retraction
Wound Healing Rates and Wound Problems of Conventional Circumcision Compared With Ring Circumcision: A Meta-Analysis
Paper Information
Retraction Details
Citations (5)
5
Total Citations1
Post-Retraction(20.0%)
3
Pre-Retraction0
Same DayPost-Retraction Citation Analysis
1
Within 30 days
1
Within 1 year
0
After 2+ years
26
Days since retraction (latest)
Heavy Metals Removal Using Carbon Based Nanocomposites
Unknown Authors
Unknown Journal
Published: Unknown
Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and early complications of conventional circumcision techniques and thermocautery-assisted circumcision
Bedreddin Kalyenci, Can Benlioğlu, Mahmut Taha Ölçücü et al. (7 authors)
Scientific Reports
Open Access
Published: Feb 2025
1 citation
1 citation
26 days after retraction
<scp>RETRACTION</scp>: Wound Healing Rates and Wound Problems of Conventional Circumcision Compared With Ring Circumcision: A Meta‐Analysis
Unknown Authors
International Wound Journal
Open Access
Published: Feb 2025
1 days before retraction
Biological welding: a rapid and bloodless approach to circumcision
Fanchun Zeng, Qian Cao, Fengwen Fu et al. (5 authors)
World Journal of Urology
Published: Dec 2024
1 citation
1 citation
53 days before retraction
Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta‐analysis
Daya Wang, Zhijia Li, Xi-Meng Chen et al. (4 authors)
International Wound Journal
Open Access
Published: Jun 2023
4 citations
4 citations
602 days before retraction
Quick Stats
Total Citations:
6
Years Since Retraction:
<1 year
Open Access:
Yes
Last Checked:
Jul 23, 2025